Low rectal cancer treatment strategies: a cohort study assessing watch and wait.

PURPOSE: Treatment strategies for low rectal cancer have been evolving toward achieving less treatment morbidity with the same oncological success-we aimed to assess the results of the new watch and wait (W&W) strategy in our cohort. METHODS: A tertiary care cohort study was conducted. New patients with rectal adenocarcinoma up to 6 cm from the anal margin, cM0, locally staged higher than cT1N0, evaluated between November 2014 and October 2018, were included. All 93 patients received neoadjuvant radiotherapy ± chemotherapy. Re-evaluation was planned 8-12 weeks after the end of treatment. Patients showing clinical complete response (cCR) were given the choice of either to proceed to surgery or to enter W&W. RESULTS: Of the 93 patients, 82.8% were re-evaluated and 20.8% had cCR. Patients in clinical stages II/III were significantly less likely to achieve cCR than those in stage I (p = 0.017). After a mean follow-up of 17.44 months, there were 4 regrowths in the 16 patients under W&W, all submitted to R0 surgery, ypN0; there were no deaths or local recurrences; one patient with regrowth had distant recurrence. Sixty patients underwent direct surgery after a mean follow-up of 16.23 months; 3 patients had local and distant recurrences; 7 others had only distant recurrences; there were 8 deaths. There were no statistically significant differences between patients under W&W and patients who underwent direct surgery regarding local or distant recurrences, or death (p > 0.9; p = 0.44; p = 0.19, respectively). CONCLUSION: The W&W strategy for low rectal cancer achieved the same oncological outcomes as the traditional strategy while sparing some patients from surgery.

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvic floor-a pictorial review.

Pelvic floor dysfunctions represent a range of functional disorders that frequently occur in adult women, carrying a significant burden on the quality of life, and its incidence tends to increase attending to the expected aging of the population. Pelvic floor dysfunctions can manifest as incontinence, constipation, and prolapsed pelvic organs. Since pelvic floor weakness is frequently generalized and clinically underdiagnosed, imaging evaluation is of major importance, especially prior to surgical correction. Given some interobserver variability of soft-tissue measurements, MR defecography allows a noninvasive, radiation-free, multiplanar dynamic evaluation of the three pelvic compartments simultaneously and with high spatial and temporal resolution. Both static/anatomic and dynamic/functional findings are important, since pelvic disorders can manifest as whole pelvic floor weakness/dysfunction or as an isolated or single compartment disorder. Imaging has a preponderant role in accessing pelvic floor disorders, and dynamic MR defecography presents as a reliable option, being able to evaluate the entire pelvic floor for optimal patient management before surgery. The purpose of this article is to address the female pelvic anatomy and explain the appropriate MR Defecography protocol, along with all the anatomic points, lines, angles, and measurements needed for a correct interpretation, to later focus on the different disorders of the female pelvic floor, illustrated with MR defecography images, highlighting the role of this technique in accessing these pathologic conditions.

Transmural Healing Is Associated with Improved Long-term Outcomes of Patients with Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Mucosal healing (MH) is currently accepted as one of the best treatment targets in Crohn's disease. However, even in patients with sustained MH, residual bowel wall inflammation can still be detected by cross-sectional imaging. The long-term benefits of obtaining transmural healing (TH) have not been previously assessed. METHODS: We performed an observational study including 214 patients with Crohn's disease with a magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and colonoscopy performed within a 6-month interval. Patients were classified as having TH (inactive MRE and colonoscopy), MH (active MRE with inactive colonoscopy), or no healing (active colonoscopy). Need for surgery, hospital admission, and therapy escalation were evaluated at 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Patients with TH presented lower rates of hospital admission, therapy escalation, and surgery than patients with MH or no healing. In logistic regression analysis, endoscopic remission (odds ratio 0.331 95% confidence interval [0.178-0.614], P < 0.001) and MRE remission (odds ratio 0.270 95% confidence interval [0.130-0.564], P < 0.001) were independently associated with a lower likelihood of reaching any unfavorable outcome. CONCLUSIONS: TH is associated with improved long-term outcomes in Crohn's disease and may be a more suitable target than MH.

Rectal cancer management in elderly patients: experience of a single Portuguese institution.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of rectal cancer increases with age, and older patients are more likely to have other chronic conditions that can affect outcome and tolerability of treatment. OBJECTIVE: The incidence of rectal cancer increases with age, and older patients are more likely to have other chronic conditions that can affect outcome and tolerability of treatment. METHODS: 59 patients aged 75 years and older with stage II-III rectal cancer who were treated during a 3-year period were included in the study. Comorbidities were assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the patients were divided into 2 groups based on their CCI scores: Fit (score of 0-1 points) and Vulnerable (score of greater than or = 2). Primary endpoint was survival at 1 and 3 years. RESULTS: The sample included 43 patients (72.9%) in the Fit group and 16 patients (27.1%) in the Vulnerable group. The most common comorbidities were myocardial infarction, diabetes, and chronic lung disease. One-year survival the same between the groups (P = .330), but 3-year survival was lower in the Vulnerable group patients (83.7% vs 56.3%, respectively; P = .040). The rates of neoadjuvant chemo- and radiotherapy use and low anterior resection performance were the same between the groups. Colostomy closure was achieved more frequently in the Fit group compared with the Vulnerable group (83.3% vs 55.6%; P = .083). There was no difference in mean disease-free survival, grade 3-4 toxicity, and dose reduction between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity assessment should always be included in standard oncological management of elderly patients. Fit patients can be managed with standard treatment and may bene¦t from a conventional, more aggressive approach in their therapy.